What Can We Learn About the Sensitivity of Investment to Stock Prices with a Better Measure of Tobin's q?
Coauthor(s): William Gentry.
This paper examines the responsiveness of investment to Tobin's q using data from Real
Estate Investment Trusts (REITs). We take advantage of high-quality estimates of the market
value of a firm's assets instead of the more-commonly used book value of assets to estimate a
more accurate value of q. We have three main results. First, while REITs have institutional
features that mitigate many of the complications faced by previous studies, we still find little
relationship between REIT investment and a traditional accounting-based measure of q. Yet our
appraisal-based q generates elasticities of 43 percent, as much as 8 times larger than in previous
studies. Second, when we decompose measurement error over time or remove a few large
outliers, our estimates of the elasticity of investment with respect to q grow as high as 107%.
Third, we show that other factors beyond Tobin's original model are still quite important. With
our improved measure of q, cash flow still impacts investment, even the portion of cash flow that
REITs are required by IRS rules to payout to shareholders as dividends and cannot be spent on
investment. Also, we show that the relationship between our improved q and investment is nonlinear;
with little impact of q on investment when q < 1, but very large elasticities when q
Source: Working paper
Gentry, William, and Christopher Mayer. "What Can We Learn About the Sensitivity of Investment to Stock Prices with a Better Measure of Tobin's q?" Working paper, Columbia Business School, July 2003.